home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Experimental BBS Explossion 3
/
Experimental BBS Explossion III.iso
/
gus
/
digestv2.zip
/
V2N36.TXT
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1993-02-11
|
12KB
From dsd.es.com!mailserv Mon Feb 8 00:19:45 1993 remote from vanbc
Received: from orca.es.com by van-bc.wimsey.com with smtp
(Smail3.1.28.1 #12) id m0nLTiQ-0000S8a; Mon, 8 Feb 93 00:19 PST
Received: from dsd.ES.COM ([130.187.85.113]) by orca.es.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA09780; Mon, 8 Feb 93 01:18:35 MST
Errors-To: ultrasound-owner@dsd.es.com
Received: from itchy (itchy.dsd.ES.COM) by dsd.ES.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1/e&s_server-2.1/dsd)
id AA04348; Mon, 8 Feb 93 01:18:34 MST
Errors-To: ultrasound-owner@dsd.es.com
Received: by itchy (5.61/1.34)
id AA13116; Mon, 8 Feb 93 01:17:54 -0700
Message-Id: <9302080817.AA13116@itchy>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 93 00:07:02 MST
From: Ultrasound Digest Owner <ultrasound-owner@dsd.es.com>
Errors-To: Ultrasound Digest Owner <ultrasound-owner@dsd.es.com>
Subject: Ultrasound Daily Digest V2 #36
Reply-To: Ultrasound Daily Digest <ultrasound@dsd.es.com>
Precedence: Bulk
Apparently-To: john.smith@gravis.wimsey.bc.ca
Ultrasound Daily Digest Mon, 8 Feb 93 Volume 2 : Issue 36
Today's Topics:
comanche
DRAM problems
Gus Memory (100ns or 70ns?)
Links386 & SBOS
Speaker out -> Line In Question
Speakers
Starcon 2 mod problem
Tired of Techno...
What ever happened to...
Information about the UltraSound Daily Digest (such as
mail addresses, request servers, ftp sites, etc., etc.) can be found
at the end of the Digest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1993 15:08:20 +0000 (GMT)
From: Dave Ingles <davei@central1.lancaster.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <11611.9302071508@central1.lancaster.ac.uk>
Subject: comanche
To: Ultrasound Daily Digest <ultrasound@dsd.es.com>
> I've been noticing that people have been having problems with
> getting the digitized sound to work.
>
> I've got a 256K GUS, with a 386-40, and SBOS 1.23, and it has
> always worked flawlessly. I think it worked fine with 1.22 also.
>
> Install the patch, reconfigure the sound by running comanche's
> SOUNDSET.EXE, reboot with just HIMEM and the GUS settings, and
> run SBOS with no options. Works for me!
>
> Have Fun.
> Eric A. Hobbs
> ehobbs@jupiter.nmt.edu
Perhaps you could tell us which options you used after executing soundset.com ?
Also what does your comanche.cfg file contain after configuration ?
Davei
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> D.Ingles@uk.ac.lancaster <<
>> Telephone (0524) 59 3679 <<
>> Higher Education National Software Archive, <<
>> Computer Centre, The University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, United Kingdom <<
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 93 09:55:51 -0500
From: bli@hubcap.clemson.edu (Bao Li)
Message-Id: <9302071455.AA28702@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Subject: DRAM problems
To: Ultrasound Daily Digest <ultrasound@dsd.es.com>
>In Ultrasound Digest #33 v2 ptran@sciborg.uwaterloo.ca (Phat Tran) writes:
>>Gravis first shipped the GUS with 100ns DRAMs, but then started shipping
>>boards with 70ns chips. This leads me to suspect that 100ns is not
>>fast enough.
>
>I too have been having trouble with DRAM. When I upgraded, I removed the
>original 100ns chips and installed 8 70ns chips. After that, only the
>mididemo and flidemo worked. SBOS does not work at all. Crashes every time.
>When I called Gravis, they said that it shouldn't make any difference what
>speed I used and that I better ship the card back to them for warranty repair.
>I have to wonder why they would have used 100ns chips in the first place if
>it didn't matter. Are 100ns cheaper for them? I for one have had great
>difficulty locating shops that still stock 100ns. They look at you kinda
>funny when you ask for it!
>I also had inconsistent reports from the DRAM tester but then again it is a
>beta release isn't it. :-)
>
>
>Kevin Holly
I upgraded my GUS to 1 MB with 8 60ns chips. So far, there is no
problem. Everything is fine.
Bao
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 93 10:08:38 PST
From: aktang@sdcc13.UCSD.EDU (I should be studying)
Message-Id: <9302071808.AA22437@sdcc13.UCSD.EDU>
Subject: Gus Memory (100ns or 70ns?)
To: Ultrasound Daily Digest <ultrasound@dsd.es.com>
My GUS came with 70ns chips, and I filled it to 1MB using 4 100ns
chips, 1 70ns chip, and 1 80ns chip. (Yeh, I know, weird, but I got
a good deal). Anyway, I've been having no problems at all with this
configuration. The DRAM tester says all's well.
I doubt it matters too much.
-Anthony Tang
aktang@sdcc13.ucsd.edu
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 93 11:33:06 EST
From: elewis@eve.wright.edu (Edward Lewis IV)
Message-Id: <9302071633.AA29324@eve.wright.edu.>
Subject: Links386 & SBOS
To: Ultrasound Daily Digest <ultrasound@dsd.es.com>
Lee Bollard Writes..
>From: Lee Bollard <bollard@hpspkma.spk.hp.com>
>Subject: Links386Pro & SBOS?
>I've tried to get Links386Pro (ver 1.07) to work with SBOS but
>haven't had any luck. I've tried SBOS 1.20 and 1.22, and virtually
>all the option settings.
>I'd like to hear from others who have made Links386Pro work with
>their GUS cards. Maybe they could suggest something I haven't tried.
To get Links386 to work with SBOS you must do the following:
Boot up with no Expanded memmory Mangagers (eg EMM386) (This is important)
Delete the LINKS386.CFG file from your links386 Directory
use SBOS -x2
type GOLF /S to run links386
Go into sound set-up and choose SoundBlaster
NOTE:You must have version 1.05 or higher for this to work (which you do)
This should work with SBOS v1.20 or 1.22
You should now be able to choose Soundblaster. Many people say you must
disable BACKGROUND sounds or it will lock up the game, but I have not had this
problem myself. You may also want to use IRQ 5 or 7 if free as that is the
normal SoundBlaster IRQ defaults.
If this for some reason does not work. E-mail me and We'll see if we can
figure it out. Good Luck.
Ed Lewis
elewis@eve.wright.edu
Wright State University - Dayton, Ohio
------------------------------
Date: 06 Feb 1993 23:02:35 -0500
From: "Bryon Daly, ECE Dept, UMass, Amherst" <DALY@ecs.umass.edu>
Message-Id: <01GUF28J6L5E8WW9HY@UMAECS>
Subject: Speaker out -> Line In Question
To: Ultrasound Daily Digest <ultrasound@dsd.es.com>
I'd like to be able to sample output from my stereo on my GUS. The problem
is that my cheap stereo has no Line-Out's. All it has is two sets of
speaker-outs (A & B). Previously (thanks, Francois!), I have been warned
of the dangers of connecting that output (SPEAKER-B) to the GUS's line in.
I am aware of and able to eliminate the feedback problem, but I am concerned
about the difference in output and input levels, etc between the speaker out and
the line in. Would it be enough just to play the stereo out at a very low
volume while recording, or are impedance, etc problems still too big a concern
even then? If it is still a problem, is there any simple (ie: cheap) hardware
solution to fix up this mismatch and make things acceptable for recording?
Thanks,
-Bryon
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 93 22:57:48 EST
From: tmcreek@eos.ncsu.edu
Message-Id: <9302080357.AA09878@c00100-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Speakers
To: Ultrasound Daily Digest <ultrasound@dsd.es.com>
Concerning speakers, I found a great pair of JBL's at Circuit City. They
go on sale very often for about $49-$59 a pair. They are bookshelf-size
bass-reflex speakers with 1" titanium tweeters and 5 1/4" coated woofers.
They sound great. Especially when you have them hooked to a stereo with
a 12" subwoofer!
I compared them in CC to a pair of Bose 301's. The sound was ten times
clearer, and they were cheaper to boot!
Send replies to: | My opinions do not represent
tmcreek@eos.ncsu.edu | anyone who does not feel the
creek-tm@aza.csc.ncsu.edu | same way about it as I do.
------------------------------
Date: 06 Feb 1993 23:19:56 -0500
From: "Bryon Daly, ECE Dept, UMass, Amherst" <DALY@ecs.umass.edu>
Message-Id: <01GUF2UKJRBC8WW9HY@UMAECS>
Subject: Starcon 2 mod problem
To: Ultrasound Daily Digest <ultrasound@dsd.es.com>
Hello,
I have used a program I got from wuarchive to extract the mod files from
Star Control 2 (I love the music in it). The problem is that a bunch of
the mods don't quite sound right, or are messed up somewhat. (Especially
ur-quan.mod and the intro, some of my favorite ones). I've tried playing
them in GUSMOD, trakblaster, and modedit, and they don't work right in
any of them.
I saw one post in the ibm.pc.games newsgroup stating that this was due
to some slight irregularity in certain mods which causes many mod players
to mis-play them (including GUSMOD & many others). He said that the
cause was something like this:
The samples are in order: 11112222233333....
and the mod players for some reason interpret this as
sample 1: 11112
sample 2: 22223
sample 3: 33334
or something like that, anyway. This would explain the hissing noises I
get in the ur-quan mod.
But then someone else posted that all the mods from Starcon 2 worked fine
for them using GUSMOD.
So my question is: what's the story? Is the above reasoning BS, or is it
true? Does anyone know how to get all the SC2 mods to play correctly?
Any answers/explanations would be appreciated,
Thanks,
-Bryon
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1993 00:50:18 -0700 (MST)
From: michael a finkel <mfinkel@argon.GAS.uug.Arizona.EDU>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.05.9302070018.B20188-a100000@argon>
Subject: Tired of Techno...
To: Ultrasound Daily Digest <ultrasound@dsd.es.com>
Well, the trend of .MOD's, .MID's, and .669's seems to be techno. I am
sick of this.. I have many files of merely repeated rhythm segments.
Do any of you have any (or know where to get) titles of good Industrial,
Metal, Punk, or Rock music files (mod,669, or mid)?
I would really like to know...
Thanks
| | Tell me something I don't know |
| MFinkel@Gas.uug.Arizona.edu | Show me something I can use |
| =----> Tucson, Arizona | CONNECT THE GOD DAMN DOTS |
| | -=Ministry=- |
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1993 00:47:51 -0700 (MST)
From: michael a finkel <mfinkel@argon.GAS.uug.Arizona.EDU>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.05.9302070051.A20188-a100000@argon>
Subject: What ever happened to...
To: Ultrasound Daily Digest <ultrasound@dsd.es.com>
I was curious about the reply card I sent in to Gravis quite a long time
ago... I have never heard any kind of acknowledgement that they recieved it.
I have heard much talk about getting the new patch set, the new sbos, the
package offers etc... Shouldn't I have recieved something from them in the
mail about this?
Just a concern...
| | Tell me something I don't know |
| MFinkel@Gas.uug.Arizona.edu | Show me something I can use |
| =----> Tucson, Arizona | CONNECT THE GOD DAMN DOTS |
| | -=Ministry=- |
------------------------------
End of Ultrasound Daily Digest V2 #36
******************************
Digest Address: ultrasound@dsd.es.com
To post to tomorrow's digest
Request Server Address: ultrasound-request@dsd.es.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, and request files
Owner Address: ultrasound-owner@dsd.es.com
To contact a human if the server has troubles
FTP Sites: archive.epas.utoronto.ca pub/pc/ultrasound
wuarchive.wustl.edu systems/msdos/ultrasound